4.6 Article

Indoor and Outdoor Particle Number Concentration in the Sapienza University Campus of Rome

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13169126

Keywords

ultrafine particles; particle number concentration; indoor measurements; particle modal size; indoor-outdoor ratios; source strength

Funding

  1. INAIL in the frame of its scientific research programs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the Particle Number Concentration and size distribution in a university environment, finding that PNC was dominated by ultrafine particles both indoors and outdoors. Differences among classrooms were mainly related to usage conditions, while little variation was found in PNC measured outside the classrooms.
Exposure to ultrafine particles has been associated with short- and long-term effects on human health. The object of this paper was to assess Particle Number Concentration (PNC) and size distribution in a university environment and study the indoor/outdoor relationships. Measurements were carried out using co-located (indoor/outdoor) condensation particle counters and size spectrometers during two seasonal periods characterized by different meteorological conditions at five selected classrooms different for size, capacity, floor and use destination. PNC was dominated by particles in the ultrafine mode both indoor and outdoor. The indoor/outdoor ratios were on average between 1 and 1.2 in the summer and between 0.6 and 0.9 in the winter. Mostly the differences found among classrooms could be related to the condition of use (i.e., crowding, natural air exchange, air conditioning, seasonality). Only little differences were found among PNC measured immediately outside the classrooms. Based on information taken during the measurement campaigns, on the classrooms condition of use, it was possible to assess as a source of indoor particles in the coarse mode, the presence of students and teachers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available