Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture Many countries have exempted or move to exempt forms of genome editing from GMO regulation of crop plants
Sarah M. Schmidt et al.
EMBO REPORTS (2020)
Breaking the impasse: Towards a forward-looking governance framework for gene editing with plants
Phil Macnaghten et al.
PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET (2020)
Non-safety Assessments of Genome-Edited Organisms: Should They be Included in Regulation?
Bjorn Kare Myskja et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2020)
A novel governance framework for GMO: A tiered, more flexible regulation for GMOs would help to stimulate innovation and public debate
Sigrid Bratlie et al.
EMBO REPORTS (2019)
NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing
Richard Helliwell et al.
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES (2019)
At the heart of controversies Hybrid forums as an experimental multi-actor tool to enhance sustainable practices in localized agro-food systems
Virginie Amilien et al.
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL (2019)
Time for a New EU Regulatory Framework for GM Crops?
Charlotta Zetterberg et al.
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS (2017)
Inclusion and Implementation of Socio-Economic Considerations in GMO Regulations: Needs and Recommendations
Rosa Binimelis et al.
SUSTAINABILITY (2016)
Policy masquerading as science: an examination of non-state actor involvement in European risk assessment policy for genetically modified animals
Sarah Hartley
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY (2016)
Social Impacts of GM Crops in Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review
Klara Fischer et al.
SUSTAINABILITY (2015)
A Precautionary Approach to Genetically Modified Organisms: Challenges and Implications for Policy and Science
Anne Ingeborg Myhr
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS (2010)
A typology of public engagement mechanisms
G Rowe et al.
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES (2005)