4.6 Article

A Sustainable Approach for the Refurbishment Process of Vernacular Heritage: The Sesga House Case Study (Valencia, Spain)

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13179800

Keywords

life cycle assessment; local materials; natural materials; refurbishment; traditional techniques; sustainability; vernacular architecture

Funding

  1. project Versus+/Heritage for People - European Commission as part of the Creative Europe Culture Programme [607593-CREA-1-2019-1-ES-CULT-COOP1]
  2. research project Earthen architecture in the Iberian Peninsula: study of natural, social and anthropic risks and strategies to improve resilience Risk-Terra - Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and University [RTI2018-095302-B-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the refurbishment of a traditional dwelling in Sesga, Spain, using carefully selected natural traditional materials and techniques to showcase its sustainability benefits through a life cycle assessment (LCA). Comparing three scenarios, it is demonstrated that the first option of using natural traditional materials and techniques is the most sustainable choice in terms of environmental, sociocultural, and socioeconomic factors.
The refurbishment of traditional vernacular architecture is currently of interest for the conservation of heritage, historic landscape and cultural landscape, as well as for its potential benefits in the field of environmental sustainability. The carefully selected materials and techniques used in the refurbishment of a traditional dwelling in Sesga (Valencia, Spain) maintain the local construction techniques while causing the least possible environmental impact, saving on transport and transformation and construction energy. This article uses LCA to showcase this contribution, examining three scenarios: the first option is the refurbishment of the case study using natural traditional materials and techniques; the second presents a hypothetical refurbishment using widely used industrial materials; and a third option looks at the demolition of the existing building and the addition of a new construction with widely used industrial materials. This comparison has shown where and why the first option is, broadly speaking, the most sustainable option in environmental, sociocultural and socioeconomic terms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available