4.6 Article

Understanding the Dynamics of Green and Blue Spaces for Health and Wellbeing Outcomes in Ireland: A Systemic Stakeholder Perspective

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13179553

Keywords

green and blue space; health and wellbeing; social inequalities; systems thinking

Funding

  1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Ireland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the structural and behavioral dynamics of green and blue spaces, people, and health outcomes using a multidisciplinary, multistakeholder systems approach. It emphasizes the importance of multiple uses of green and blue spaces for social cohesion, mental and physical benefits, and argues that delivering universal services at a scale proportional to the level of need is vital to ensure equal access to services and health benefits.
Despite the recognised benefits to human health from green and blue spaces, socioeconomic inequalities in access to and use of such spaces have been observed. Using a multidisciplinary, multistakeholder systems approach and structural equation modelling, this paper examines the structural and behavioural dynamics of green and blue spaces, people and health and wellbeing outcomes. Systems thinking offers a deeper understanding of the dynamics of collective choices at all levels within the determinants and the circular causality of these processes. The resulting map shows that behavioural and structural dynamics of green and blue spaces reinforce social cohesion, mental and physical benefits and their circular causality. Acknowledging the importance of multiple uses of green and blue spaces, this paper concludes that delivering universal services at a scale and intensity proportionate to the degree of need is vital to ensure services and health and wellbeing benefits are available to all, not only the most advantaged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available