4.6 Article

Blockchain Based Crop Insurance: A Decentralized Insurance System for Modernization of Indian Farmers

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13168921

Keywords

Google Cloud; crop insurance; blockchain; ethereum; open source; latency

Funding

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a blockchain-based crop insurance solution that is affordable, efficient, and low-cost, ensuring many farmers have access to timely crop insurance. Tests have shown that the system is effective and plans are being made for future improvements on open source platforms.
Conventional crop insurance systems are complex and often not economically feasible. Farmers are often reluctant to be covered for their crops due to lack of trust in insurance firms and the fear of delayed or non-payment of claims. In this paper, a blockchain based crop insurance solution is suggested. The solution suggested in this paper is an affordable, efficient, low cost crop insurance solution which will ensure many farmers are insured and benefiting from timely crop insurance. Currently the cost of administering insurance is an essential barrier to accessing this facility. With the proper use of blockchain based on ethereum this expense can be reduced dramatically. We have conducted various tests on platforms such as Google Cloud and found that the least throughput is 165 transactions. Upon analysis we have found that the time taken by the block formation is directly proportional to the timing of processing. The end-to-end average latency of the system was achieved as 31.2 s, which was quite effective for the infrastructure what we are using. Upon conducting acceptance testing, we found that the system suggested in the paper is effective and we are planning to release the application on open source platforms for future improvements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available