4.6 Article

Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Biochar from Willow Grown on Marginal Lands in Finland

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su131810097

Keywords

life cycle assessment; carbon footprint; biochar; pyrolysis; willow; marginal lands; lignocellulosic biomass

Funding

  1. European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Willow biochar has the potential to sequester carbon, but should not be grown on arable lands to avoid competition with food production. This study in Finland calculated the carbon footprint of willow biochar and found that it could partially compensate agricultural greenhouse gas emissions when produced on marginal lands.
Willow biochar can help to sequestrate carbon. However, biomasses should not be grown on arable lands, as it would increase competition with food production and lead to sustainability issues such as increased food prices and decreased food security. The purpose of this study is to calculate the carbon footprint (CF) of willow biochar in Finland and assess the greenhouse gas compensation potential of marginal lands if they are utilized for willow biochar production. The CF of willow biochar is inadequately assessed together with marginal lands in the literature. A cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of willow biochar was conducted. The results were then applied to assess the total CF of marginal lands. It was found that the CF of willow biochar is -1875 kgCO(2)eq t(-1) of dry biochar. Grown on marginal lands in Finland, willow biochar could compensate 7.7% of yearly agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. On buffer zones, willow biochar could also compensate some of the emissions depending on the zone size. The results of the study support current findings of biochar as a carbon negative product. The study also indicates that willow biochar produced in marginal lands can be used to compensate agricultural greenhouse gas emissions to some extent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available