4.2 Article

Methane seepage in the Shenhu area of the northern South China Sea: constraints from carbonate chimneys

Journal

GEO-MARINE LETTERS
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 175-186

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00367-016-0438-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF of China [41473080, 41306061, 91228206]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-301]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB06030102]
  4. CAS/SAFEA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two authigenic carbonate chimneys were recovered from the Shenhu area in the northern South China Sea at approximately 400 m water depth. The chimneys' mineralogy, isotopic composition, and lipid biomarkers were studied to examine the biogeochemical process that induced the formation of the chimneys. The two chimneys are composed mostly of dolomite, whereas the internal conduits and semi-consolidated surrounding sediments are dominated by aragonite and calcite. The specific biomarker patterns (distribution of lipids and their depleted delta C-13 values) indicate the low occurrence of methanotrophic archaea ANME-1 responsible for the chimneys' formation via anaerobic oxidation of methane. A significant input of bacteria/planktonic algae and cyanobacteria to the carbon pool during the precipitation of the carbonate chimneys is suggested by the high contributions of short-chain n-alkanes (69% of total hydrocarbons) and long-chain n-alcohols (on average 56% of total alcohols). The oxygen isotopic compositions of the carbonate mixtures vary from 3.1aEuro degrees to 4.4aEuro degrees in the dolomite-rich chimneys, and from 2.1aEuro degrees to 2.5aEuro degrees in the internal conduits, which indicates that they were precipitated from seawater-derived pore waters during a long period covering the last glacial and interglacial cycles. In addition, the mixture of methane and bottom seawater dissolved inorganic carbon could be the carbon sources of the carbonate chimneys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available