4.8 Article

Quantitative characterization of the energy harvesting performance of soft-contact sphere triboelectric nanogenerator

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106186

Keywords

Triboelectric nanogenerator; Contact model; Fill rate; Hardness; Elastic modulus

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [52005433]
  2. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK20180933]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Institutions [19KJB460028]
  4. Special Cooperation Foundation for Yangzhou YZU [2020182]
  5. Qing Lan Project from Yangzhou University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on factors that affect the output performance of SS-TENG and establishes a model to quantitatively describe the output. The optimized fill rate is determined to be 0.83, providing a significant reference for the optimization of blue energy harvesting TENG.
Reliable and persistent power supply becomes a key issue for the embedded system and wireless condition monitoring system. The soft-contact spherical triboelectric nanogenerator (SS-TENG) is an effective way to harvesting the blue energy, which can enhance the maximum output charge by ten times compared with a hard PTFE equipped TENG. This paper summarizes the factors that affect the output performance of SS-TENG, such as fill rate, shore hardness, elastic modulus, bulk density and kinematic property of soft sphere. The elastic modulus and shore hardness of soft sphere are analyzed. A universal contact model is coupled with the configuration and basic principle of TENG, which can characterize the output of SS-TENG quantitatively. Furthermore, effects of sphere hardness, radius, excitation frequency and transfer charge are comprehensively analyzed. Theoretical results indicate that the optimized fill rate should be 0.83. These findings provide significant optimization approach for blue energy harvesting TENG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available