4.2 Review

Vitamin D and asthma occurrence in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.07.005

Keywords

Vitamin D supplement; 25-OHD; Asthma; Children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that children with asthma had significantly lower levels of 25-OHD compared to those without asthma, and asthma patients who received vitamin D supplementation had a significantly lower recurrence rate. Thus, vitamin D may have potential roles in the prevention and treatment of asthma in children.
Problem: The association between serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) level and asthma occurrence in children was controversial. Eligibility criteria: The Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library were systematically searched up to April 13th 2020. All the study measured the serum 25-OHD level in children, or classified the children based on the 25-OHD level into severe vitamin D deficiency, insufficient deficiency and comparing the prevalence of asthma in childhood were included in our study. Sample: A total of 35 studies were included in our meta-analysis. Among them, 24 studies were included for analyzing the association between 25-OHD level and asthma, and 12 studies evaluated the treatment effect of vitamin D. Results: The children with asthma (5711 participants) had significant lower 25-OHD level than children without asthma (21,561 participants) (21.7 ng/ml versus 26.5 ng/ml, SMD = -1.36, 95% = -2.40-0.32, P = 0.010). Besides, the children with asthma treated with vitamin D supplement had a significantly lower recurrence rate than the placebo group (18.4% versus 35.9%, RR = 0.35, 95%CI = 0.35-0.79, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Children with asthma had a lower 25-OHD level than healthy children. Vitamin D supplement could decrease the asthma recurrence rate in the follow-up years. Implications: This study implies that lower 25-OHD may cause asthma in childhood. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available