4.7 Review

Graphene-based nanomaterials for breast cancer treatment: promising therapeutic strategies

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00902-8

Keywords

Graphene-based nanomaterial; Breast cancer; Therapeutic strategies; Targeting

Funding

  1. Special Fund of Foshan Summit Plan [2020B018, 2019D039, 2019D041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review highlights the potential applications of graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) in the treatment of breast cancer, including drug delivery, gene therapy, and phototherapy, showcasing their advantages in enhancing therapeutic effects, reducing toxicity, overcoming multidrug resistance, and inhibiting tumor metastasis.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and its incidence increases annually. Traditional therapies have several side effects, leading to the urgent need to explore new smart drug-delivery systems and find new therapeutic strategies. Graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) are potential drug carriers due to their target selectivity, easy functionalization, chemosensitization and high drug-loading capacity. Previous studies have revealed that GBNs play an important role in fighting breast cancer. Here, we have summarized the superior properties of GBNs and modifications to shape GBNs for improved function. Then, we focus on the applications of GBNs in breast cancer treatment, including drug delivery, gene therapy, phototherapy, and magnetothermal therapy (MTT), and as a platform to combine multiple therapies. Their advantages in enhancing therapeutic effects, reducing the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs, overcoming multidrug resistance (MDR) and inhibiting tumor metastasis are highlighted. This review aims to help evaluate GBNs as therapeutic strategies and provide additional novel ideas for their application in breast cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available