4.4 Article

Entanglement wedge minimum cross-section in holographic massive gravity theory

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2021)113

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence; Black Holes; Holography and condensed matter physics (AdS/CMT)

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [11805083, 11905083, 12005077]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021A1515012374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the holographic massive gravity theory, the entanglement wedge cross-section (EWCS) and mutual information (MI) exhibit opposite behaviors in the critical region, indicating that EWCS captures different degrees of freedom from MI. Furthermore, EWCS, MI, and HEE show the same scaling behavior in the critical region. We provide an analytical understanding of this phenomenon, as well as two mechanisms of quantum information scaling behavior in the thermodynamic phase transition by comparing the behavior in holographic superconductors.
We study the entanglement wedge cross-section (EWCS) in holographic massive gravity theory, in which a first and second-order phase transition can occur. We find that the mixed state entanglement measures, the EWCS and mutual information (MI) can characterize the phase transitions. The EWCS and MI show exactly the opposite behavior in the critical region, which suggests that the EWCS captures distinct degrees of freedom from that of the MI. More importantly, EWCS, MI and HEE all show the same scaling behavior in the critical region. We give an analytical understanding of this phenomenon. By comparing the quantum information behavior in the thermodynamic phase transition of holographic superconductors, we analyze the relationship and difference between them and provide two mechanisms of quantum information scaling behavior in the thermodynamic phase transition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available