4.4 Article

Seeing the entanglement wedge

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2021)134

Keywords

2D Gravity; AdS-CFT Correspondence; Black Holes; Gauge-gravity correspondence

Funding

  1. Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics
  2. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0019380, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY1820912, 2014215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduced a unitary operation that brings the entanglement wedge into causal contact with the boundary, including cases related to boundary sub-regions, which is closely related to the Connes Cocycle flow. The discussion also involved generalizing the work by Ceyhan & Faulkner to regions consisting of disconnected spherical caps.
We study the problem of revealing the entanglement wedge using simple operations. We ask what operation a semiclassical observer can do to bring the entanglement wedge into causal contact with the boundary, via backreaction. In a generic perturbative class of states, we propose a unitary operation in the causal wedge whose backreaction brings all of the previously causally inaccessible 'peninsula' into causal contact with the boundary. This class of cases includes entanglement wedges associated to boundary sub-regions that are unions of disjoint spherical caps, and the protocol works to first order in the size of the peninsula. The unitary is closely related to the so-called Connes Cocycle flow, which is a unitary that is both well-defined in QFT and localised to a sub-region. Our construction requires a generalization of the work by Ceyhan & Faulkner to regions which are unions of disconnected spherical caps. We discuss this generalization in the appendix. We argue that this cocycle should be thought of as naturally generalizing the non-local coupling introduced in the work of Gao, Jafferis & Wall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available