4.6 Article

Mapping Cerebrovascular Reactivity Impairment in Patients With Symptomatic Unilateral Carotid Artery Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020792

Keywords

BOLD-CVR; hemodynamic; ICA occlusion; ICA stenosis; ischemic infarct

Funding

  1. Clinical Research Priority Program of the University of Zurich (UZH CRPP Stroke)
  2. Swiss Cancer League [KFS-3975-082016-R]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PP00P3_170683]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comprehensive hemodynamic impairment mapping using BOLD CVR can identify hemodynamically relevant symptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis or occlusion. Patients with occlusion showed lower CVR values compared to healthy subjects and those with stenosis, with only 58% of the cohort exhibiting significant CVR impairment.
Background Comprehensive hemodynamic impairment mapping using blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) can be used to identify hemodynamically relevant symptomatic unilateral carotid artery disease. Methods and Results This prospective cohort study was conducted between February 2015 and July 2020 at the Clinical Neuroscience Center of the University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. One hundred two patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic unilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion or with 70% to 99% ICA stenosis were included. An age-matched healthy cohort of 12 subjects underwent an identical BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging examination. Using BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging with a standardized CO2 stimulus, CVR impairment was evaluated. Moreover, embolic versus hemodynamic ischemic patterns were evaluated on diffusion-weighted imaging. Sixty-seven patients had unilateral ICA occlusion and 35 patients unilateral 70% to 99% ICA stenosis. Patients with ICA occlusion exhibited lower whole-brain and ipsilateral hemisphere mean BOLD-CVR values as compared with healthy subjects (0.12 +/- 0.08 versus 0.19 +/- 0.04, P=0.004 and 0.09 +/- 0.09 versus 0.18 +/- 0.04, P<0.001) and ICA stenosis cohort (0.12 +/- 0.08 versus 0.16 +/- 0.05, P=0.01 and 0.09 +/- 0.09 versus 0.15 +/- 0.05, P=0.01); however, only 40 (58%) patients of the cohort showed significant BOLD-CVR impairment. Conversely, there was no difference in mean BOLD-CVR values between healthy patients and patients with ICA stenosis, although 5 (14%) patients with ICA stenosis showed a significant BOLD-CVR impairment. No significant BOLD-CVR difference was discernible between patients with hemodynamic ischemic infarcts versus those with embolic infarct distribution (0.11 +/- 0.08 versus 0.13 +/- 0.06, P=0.12). Conclusions Comprehensive BOLD-CVR mapping allows for identification of hemodynamically relevant symptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis or occlusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available