4.4 Article

Who/What Is My Teammate? Team Composition Considerations in Human-AI Teaming

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 288-299

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2021.3086018

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Task analysis; Measurement; Teamwork; Games; Training; Artificial intelligence (AI); human-AI teaming; human-autonomy teaming; human-computer interaction; human-machine teaming; reinforcement learning

Funding

  1. NSF [1829008]
  2. AFOSR Award [FA9550-20-1-0342]
  3. Division Of Graduate Education
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1829008] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the characteristics and dynamics of human-AI teams in emergency response management scenarios, finding that mixed human-AI teams outperformed all-human teams, with AI-only teams achieving the highest performance. However, the study also highlighted the negative impact of mixed teams on perceived team cognition.
There are many unknowns regarding the characteristics and dynamics of human-AI teams, including a lack of understanding of how certain human-human teaming concepts may or may not apply to human-AI teams and how this composition affects team performance. This article outlines an experimental research study that investigates essential aspects of human-AI teaming such as team performance, team situation awareness, and perceived team cognition in various mixed composition teams (human-only, human-human-AI, human-AI-AI, and AI-only) through a simulated emergency response management scenario. Results indicate dichotomous outcomes regarding perceived team cognition and performance metrics, as perceived team cognition was not predictive of performance. Performance metrics like team situational awareness and team score showed that teams composed of all human participants performed at a lower level than mixed human-AI teams, with the AI-only teams attaining the highest performance. Perceived team cognition was highest in human-only teams, with mixed composition teams reporting perceived team cognition 58% below the all-human teams. These results inform future mixed teams of the potential performance gains in utilizing mixed teams' over human-only teams in certain applications, while also highlighting mixed teams' adverse effects on perceived team cognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available