4.6 Article

Rule-Based Modeling With DBSCAN-Based Information Granules

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 51, Issue 7, Pages 3653-3663

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2902603

Keywords

Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN); fuzzy rules; granular output intervals; rule-based modeling; weighted median

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [STPGP 462980-14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rule-based models are effective in analyzing complex nonlinear system behaviors. Utilizing DBSCAN to construct information granules can enhance model accuracy. Experiments showed that the rule-based modeling approach proposed in this paper performs the best in analyzing system behaviors.
Rule-based models are applicable to model the behavior of complex and nonlinear systems. Due to limited experience and randomness involving constructing information granules, an insufficient credible rules division could reduce the model's accuracy. This paper proposes a new rule-based modeling approach, which utilizes density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN)-based information granules to construct the rules. First, bear in mind the advantages of density-based clustering, DBSCAN is proposed to generate data structures. Based on these data structures, two rule-based models are constructed: 1) models using DBSCAN clusters to construct granules and rules directly and 2) models generating subgranules in each DBSCAN cluster for rule formation. Experiments involving these two models are completed, and obtained results are compared with those generated with a traditional model involving fuzzy C-means-based granules. Numerical results show that the rule-based model, which builds rules from subgranules of DBSCAN structures, performs the best in analyzing system behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available