4.6 Article

Elastic Net Constraint-Based Tensor Model for High-Order Graph Matching

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 51, Issue 8, Pages 4062-4074

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2936176

Keywords

Optimization; Linear programming; Frequency modulation; Computational modeling; Approximation algorithms; Probabilistic logic; Elastic net; high-order graph matching; nonmonotone spectral projected gradient (NSPG); tensor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [61671253, 61701259]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M591891]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150864]
  4. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [C1007-15G]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper proposed an elastic net constraint-based tensor model for high-order graph matching, introducing a tradeoff between sparsity and accuracy. A nonmonotone spectral projected gradient method was derived for optimization, proving global convergence and superiority of the method through experiments.
The procedure of establishing the correspondence between two sets of feature points is important in computer vision applications. In this article, an elastic net constraint-based tensor model is proposed for high-order graph matching. To control the tradeoff between the sparsity and the accuracy of the matching results, an elastic net constraint is introduced into the tensor-based graph matching model. Then, a nonmonotone spectral projected gradient (NSPG) method is derived to solve the proposed matching model. During the optimization of using NSPG, we propose an algorithm to calculate the projection on the feasible convex sets of elastic net constraint. Further, the global convergence of solving the proposed model using the NSPG method was proved. The superiority of the proposed method is verified through experiments on the synthetic data and natural images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available