4.7 Article

Application of Genomic Selection at the Early Stage of Breeding Pipeline in Tropical Maize

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.685488

Keywords

early-stage testing; genomic selection; prediction accuracy; tropical maize; GBLUP

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Stress Tolerant Maize for Africa (STMA) [OPP1134248]
  3. AGG project (Accelerating Genetic Gains in Maize andWheat for Improved Livelihoods
  4. BMGF Investment) [INV-003439]
  5. CGIAR Research Program MAIZE
  6. Government of Australia
  7. Government of Belgium
  8. Government of Canada
  9. Government of China
  10. Government of France
  11. Government of India
  12. Government of Japan
  13. Government of Korea
  14. Government of Mexico
  15. Government of Netherlands
  16. Government of New Zealand
  17. Government of Norway
  18. Government of Sweden
  19. Government of Switzerland
  20. Government of United Kingdom
  21. Government of United States
  22. World Bank

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate genomic selection prediction scenarios for grain yield and agronomic traits of tropical maize, based on multi-year empirical data for designing a GS-based strategy at the early stages of the breeding pipeline. By combining multiple years of data for training, the prediction accuracy can be increased, leading to significant resource savings in maize breeding programs.
In maize, doubled haploid (DH) line production capacity of large-sized maize breeding programs often exceeds the capacity to phenotypically evaluate the complete set of testcross candidates in multi-location trials. The ability to partially select DH lines based on genotypic data while maintaining or improving genetic gains for key traits using phenotypic selection can result in significant resource savings. The present study aimed to evaluate genomic selection (GS) prediction scenarios for grain yield and agronomic traits of one of the tropical maize breeding pipelines of CIMMYT in eastern Africa, based on multi-year empirical data for designing a GS-based strategy at the early stages of the pipeline. We used field data from 3,068 tropical maize DH lines genotyped using rAmpSeq markers and evaluated as test crosses in well-watered (WW) and water-stress (WS) environments in Kenya from 2017 to 2019. Three prediction schemes were compared: (1) 1 year of performance data to predict a second year; (2) 2 years of pooled data to predict performance in the third year, and (3) using individual or pooled data plus converting a certain proportion of individuals from the testing set (TST) to the training set (TRN) to predict the next year's data. Employing five-fold cross-validation, the mean prediction accuracies for grain yield (GY) varied from 0.19 to 0.29 under WW and 0.22 to 0.31 under WS, when the 1-year datasets were used training set to predict a second year's data as a testing set. The mean prediction accuracies increased to 0.32 under WW and 0.31 under WS when the 2-year datasets were used as a training set to predict the third-year data set. In a forward prediction scenario, good predictive abilities (0.53 to 0.71) were found when the training set consisted of the previous year's breeding data and converting 30% of the next year's data from the testing set to the training set. The prediction accuracy for anthesis date and plant height across WW and WS environments obtained using 1-year data and integrating 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90% of the TST set to TRN set was much higher than those trained in individual years. We demonstrate that by increasing the TRN set to include genotypic and phenotypic data from the previous year and combining only 10-30% of the lines from the year of testing, the predicting accuracy can be increased, which in turn could be used to replace the first stage of field-based screening partially, thus saving significant costs associated with the testcross formation and multi-location testcross evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available