4.6 Article

Novel mutations in LRP6 highlight the role of WNT signaling in tooth agenesis

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1158-1162

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.10

Keywords

LRP6; molecular inversion probes; tooth agenesis; Wnt/beta-catenin canonical signaling pathway

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Human Genome Research Institute [RO1NS058529, U54HG006542]
  2. Medical Research Council [G0901539, MR/M012174/1]
  3. European Orthodontic Society (EOS research grant) [048]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1085997] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/M012174/1, G0901539] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [G0901539, MR/M012174/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We aimed to identify a novel genetic cause of tooth agenesis (TA) and/or orofacial clefting (OFC) by combining whole-exome sequencing (WES) and targeted resequencing in a large cohort of TA and OFC patients. Methods: WES was performed in two unrelated patients: one with severe TA and OFC and another with severe TA only. After deleterious mutations were identified in a gene encoding low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6), all its exons were resequenced with molecular inversion probes in 67 patients with TA, 1,072 patients with OFC, and 706 controls. Results: We identified a frameshift (c.4594de1G, p.Cys1532fs) and a canonical splice-site mutation (c.3398-2A>C, p.?) in LRP6, respectively, in the patient with TA and OFC and in the patient with severe TA only. The targeted resequencing showed significant enrichment of unique LRP6 variants in TA patients but not in nonsyndromic OFC patients. Of the five variants in patients with TA, two affected the canonical splice site and three were missense variants; all variants segregated with the dominant phenotype, and in one case the missense mutation occurred de novo. Conclusion: Mutations in LRP6 cause TA in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available