4.8 Article

Within-host evolutionary dynamics of seasonal and pandemic human influenza A viruses in young children

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.68917

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. H2020 European Research Council [818353]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [N01-A0-50042]
  3. National Institutes of Health [HHSN272200500042C]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [818353] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolution of influenza viruses is primarily influenced by within-host processes, with long-term infections in young children allowing for the maintenance of virus diversity through mutation-selection balance, creating potentially important opportunities for within-host virus evolution.
The evolution of influenza viruses is fundamentally shaped by within-host processes. However, the within-host evolutionary dynamics of influenza viruses remain incompletely understood, in part because most studies have focused on infections in healthy adults based on single timepoint data. Here, we analyzed the within-host evolution of 82 longitudinally sampled individuals, mostly young children, infected with A/H1N1pdm09 or A/H3N2 viruses between 2007 and 2009. For A/H1N1pdm09 infections during the 2009 pandemic, nonsynonymous minority variants were more prevalent than synonymous ones. For A/H3N2 viruses in young children, early infection was dominated by purifying selection. As these infections progressed, nonsynonymous variants typically increased in frequency even when within-host virus titers decreased. Unlike the short-lived infections of adults where de novo within-host variants are rare, longer infections in young children allow for the maintenance of virus diversity via mutation-selection balance creating potentially important opportunities for within-host virus evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available