4.8 Article

In silico analysis of the transcriptional regulatory logic of neuronal identity specification throughout the C. elegans nervous system

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.64906

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Oliver Hobert [R01NS100547]
  2. National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing single cell expression profiles of all neuron classes in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system, this study identified multiple transcription factors that directly co-regulate effector genes defining neuron types, confirming the concept of terminal selectors of neuronal identity. This research provides a blueprint for how individual components of an entire nervous system are genetically specified.
The generation of the enormous diversity of neuronal cell types in a differentiating nervous system entails the activation of neuron type-specific gene batteries. To examine the regulatory logic that controls the expression of neuron type-specific gene batteries, we interrogate single cell expression profiles of all 118 neuron classes of the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system for the presence of DNA binding motifs of 136 neuronally expressed C. elegans transcription factors. Using a phylogenetic footprinting pipeline, we identify cis-regulatory motif enrichments among neuron class-specific gene batteries and we identify cognate transcription factors for 117 of the 118 neuron classes. In addition to predicting novel regulators of neuronal identities, our nervous system-wide analysis at single cell resolution supports the hypothesis that many transcription factors directly co-regulate the cohort of effector genes that define a neuron type, thereby corroborating the concept of so-called terminal selectors of neuronal identity. Our analysis provides a blueprint for how individual components of an entire nervous system are genetically specified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available