4.8 Article

circPTPN12/miR-21-5 p/ΔNp63α pathway contributes to human endometrial fibrosis

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.65735

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA16040302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971336, 81771526, 82071600]
  3. Excellent Youth Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170051]
  4. Jiangsu Province's Key Provincial Talents Program [ZDRCA2016067]
  5. Jiangsu Biobank of Clinical Resources [BM2015004]
  6. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1004404]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging evidence suggests a crucial role of circRNAs in regulating pathological processes, with circPTPN12 identified as a factor in endometrial fibrosis pathology. Dysfunction of the circPTPN12 pathway contributes to the pathogenesis of endometrial fibrosis.
Emerging evidence demonstrates the important role of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in regulating pathological processes in various diseases including organ fibrosis. Endometrium fibrosis is the leading cause of uterine infertility, but the role of circRNAs in its pathogenesis is largely unknown. Here, we provide the evidence that upregulation of circPTPN12 in endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) of fibrotic endometrium functions as endogenous sponge of miR-21-5 p to inhibit miR-21-5 p expression and activity, which in turn results in upregulation of Delta Np63 alpha to induce the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) of EECs (EEC-EMT). In a mouse model of endometrium fibrosis, circPTPN12 appears to be a cofactor of driving EEC-EMT and administration of miR-21-5 p could reverse this process and improve endometrial fibrosis. Our findings revealed that the dysfunction of circPTPN12/miR-21-5 p/Delta Np63 alpha pathway contributed to the pathogenesis of endometrial fibrosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available