4.8 Article

Sensory coding and the causal impact of mouse cortex in a visual decision

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.63163

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [095668, 095669]
  2. Human FrontiersScience Program [LT001071]
  3. Horizon 2020 [656528]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council CoMPLEX PhD studentship
  5. European Research Council [694401]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [694401] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correlates of sensory stimuli and motor actions are found in multiple cortical areas, but only the sensory signals localized in visual and frontal cortex play a causal role in task performance, while widespread dorsal cortical signals correlating with movement reflect processes that do not play a causal role.
Correlates of sensory stimuli and motor actions are found in multiple cortical areas, but such correlates do not indicate whether these areas are causally relevant to task performance. We trained mice to discriminate visual contrast and report their decision by steering a wheel. Widefield calcium imaging and Neuropixels recordings in cortex revealed stimulus-related activity in visual (VIS) and frontal (MOs) areas, and widespread movement-related activity across the whole dorsal cortex. Optogenetic inactivation biased choices only when targeted at VIS and MOs, proportionally to each site's encoding of the visual stimulus, and at times corresponding to peak stimulus decoding. A neurometric model based on summing and subtracting activity in VIS and MOs successfully described behavioral performance and predicted the effect of optogenetic inactivation. Thus, sensory signals localized in visual and frontal cortex play a causal role in task performance, while widespread dorsal cortical signals correlating with movement reflect processes that do not play a causal role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available