4.8 Article

The interplay of RNA:DNA hybrid structure and G-quadruplexes determines the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72286

Keywords

DNA replication; R-loop; G-quadruplex; Pif1; RNase H; replisome; transcription-replication conflict; S; cerevisiae

Categories

Funding

  1. MSKCC Functional Genomics Initiative grant
  2. NIGMS [R01-GM127428, R01--GM107239]
  3. NIH [ES031635]
  4. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

R-loops can lead to replication stress, but the impact can be suppressed by RNase H1 and Pif1. Replisomes have the ability to maintain fork progression in certain conditions, providing a mechanistic basis for distinguishing harmful from non-harmful R-loops.
R-loops are a major source of genome instability associated with transcription-induced replication stress. However, how R-loops inherently impact replication fork progression is not understood. Here, we characterize R-loop-replisome collisions using a fully reconstituted eukaryotic DNA replication system. We find that RNA:DNA hybrids and G-quadruplexes at both co-directional and head-on R-loops can impact fork progression by inducing fork stalling, uncoupling of leading strand synthesis from replisome progression, and nascent strand gaps. RNase H1 and Pif1 suppress replication defects by resolving RNA:DNA hybrids and G-quadruplexes, respectively. We also identify an intrinsic capacity of replisomes to maintain fork progression at certain R-loops by unwinding RNA:DNA hybrids, repriming leading strand synthesis downstream of G-quadruplexes, or utilizing R-loop transcripts to prime leading strand restart during co-directional R-loop-replisome collisions. Collectively, the data demonstrates that the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions is modulated by R-loop structure, providing a mechanistic basis for the distinction of deleterious from non-deleterious R-loops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available