4.6 Article

Benthic Nutrient Fluxes across Subtidal and Intertidal Habitats in Breton Sound in Response to River-Pulses of a Diversion in Mississippi River Delta

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13172323

Keywords

subtidal sediments; intertidal wetland soils; benthic fluxes; denitrification; flood pulse; delta restoration; ecosystem design

Funding

  1. Water and Watershed Research Program of the EPA/USDA/NSF [R828009]
  2. Louisiana Department of Natural Resources [2503-01-27]
  3. USDA/CSREES/EPA Nutrient Science for Improved Watershed Management Program [2002-00561]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Benthic fluxes of dissolved nutrients were measured in subtidal sediments and intertidal soils associated with river-pulse events from the Mississippi River via a diversion structure at Caernarvon, LA. Intertidal habitats were found to remove a higher percentage of NO3- compared to subtidal habitats, especially at higher water temperatures and diversion discharge rates. River diversion operations have significant ecosystem design considerations for reducing the negative impacts of eutrophication in downstream coastal waters.
We measured benthic fluxes of dissolved nutrients in subtidal sediments and intertidal soils associated with river-pulse events from Mississippi River via the operation of a river diversion structure at Caernarvon, LA. Experiments measuring benthic fluxes in subtidal habitats were conducted during the early spring flood pulse (February and March) each year from 2002 to 2004, compared to benthic fluxes of intertidal habitats measured in February and March 2004. Nitrate (NO3-) uptake rates for subtidal sediments and intertidal soils depended on overlying water NO3- concentrations at near-, mid-, and far-field locations during river-pulse experiments when water temperatures were >13 degrees C (NO3- removal was limited below this temperature threshold). NO3- loading to upper Breton Sound was estimated for nine river-pulse events (January, February, and March in 2002, 2003, and 2004) and compared to NO3- removal estimated by the subtidal and intertidal habitats based on connectivity, area, and flux rates as a function of NO3- concentration and water temperature. Most NO3- removal was accomplished by intertidal habitats compared to subtidal habitats with the total NO3- reduction ranging from 8% to 31%, depending on water temperature and diversion discharge rates. River diversion operations have important ecosystem design considerations to reduce the negative effects of eutrophication in downstream coastal waters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available