4.6 Article

The Importance of Including Water Temperature Simulations in a 2D Fish Habitat Model for the St. Lawrence River

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13131736

Keywords

2D model; common carp; fish habitat; fuzzy logic; water temperature

Funding

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Nature et technologies (FRQNT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that high water temperatures led to a massive fish mortality event in the St. Lawrence River in 2001. Suitable spawning habitats for common carp were severely affected, reducing to less than 15% of the potential suitable habitat.
Extreme climatic conditions likely caused a massive fish mortality during the summer of 2001 in the St. Lawrence River. To corroborate this hypothesis, we used a physical habitat simulation approach incorporating hydraulic and water temperature models. Spawning Habitat Suitability Indices (HSI) for common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were developed using fuzzy logic and applied to the model outputs to estimate habitat weighted usable area during the event. The results revealed that areas suitable for common carp spawning (HSI > 0.3) were severely reduced by high water temperatures, which exceeded 28 degrees C during the mortality event. During the mortality event, the amount of suitable habitat was reduced to <200 ha/day, representing less than 15% of the maximum potential suitable habitat in the study reach. In addition, the availability of cooler habitats that could have been used as thermal refuges was also reduced. These results indicate that the high water temperature in spawning areas and reduced accessibility to thermal refuge habitats exposed the carp to substantial physiological and environmental stress. The high water temperatures were highly detrimental to the fish and eventually led to the observed mortalities. This study demonstrates the importance of including water temperature in habitat suitability models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available