4.6 Article

Estimation of the Average Retention Time of Precipitation at the Surface of a Catchment Area for Lake Biwa

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13121711

Keywords

lake water level; precipitation retention time; impulse response function; subsurface flow; snow water equivalent; snowmelt; climate change; Lake Biwa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing a lake catchment system, the study identified the average precipitation retention time and found that the precipitation retention time during snowmelt is shorter than during the dry season. The shape of the response function reflects the lake system and this knowledge can aid lake resource management and conservation efforts.
In a lake catchment system, we analyzed the lake water-level responses to precipitation. Moreover, we identified the average precipitation retention time-due to subsurface flows-from the delay time calculated using the response function with data of water level and catchment precipitation (both rainfall and snowfall) collected over 30 years of continuous observations of Lake Biwa, Japan. We focused on the snow reserves and the water-level response delay due to the snowmelt of Lake Biwa catchment. We concluded that the average precipitation retention time of the catchment subsurface flow (i.e., above the impermeable layer) in Lake Biwa was approximately 45 days. Additionally, the precipitation retention time during snowmelt was shorter than that during the dry season. Overall, the shape of the response function reflects the lake system. This knowledge improves the understanding of lake systems and can be helpful for lake resource managers. Furthermore, finding the delay time from the response function may be useful for determining the contribution of rainfall to increasing the water levels of other lakes. Therefore, our results can contribute to the development of management strategies to address inland aquatic ecosystems and conservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available