4.6 Article

Estimating Future Peak Water Demand with a Regression Model Considering Climate Indices

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13141912

Keywords

long-term daily water demand forecasting; peak water demand; climate change; MLR; SVR; RF; ANN

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Regions and Tourism
  2. Graz University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impacts of climate change on water supply in Austria and proposed a general multiple linear regression model, which performed similarly to other modeling approaches. Using this model to predict future water demand, it was found that peak water demand is expected to increase by 3.5% compared to the reference period.
Although Austria is a water-rich country, impacts of climate change on water supply are already noticeable. Some regions were affected by water scarcity in recent years. Due to climate change, an increase in peak water demand is expected in the future. Therefore, water demand prediction models that include climate indices are of interest. In this paper, we present a general multiple linear regression (GMLR) model that can be applied to selected study sites. We compared the performance of the GMLR model with different modeling approaches, i.e., stepwise multiple linear regression, support vector regression, random forest regression and a neural network approach. All models were trained with water demand and weather data reaching back several years and tested with the last available observation year. The applied modeling approaches achieved a similar performance. As a second step, the GMLR model was used to estimate the peak water demands for the time period 2025-2050. For the future water demand estimate, 16 different climate projections were used. These climate projections represent the worst-case climate change scenario (RCP 8.5). The expected increase in peak water demand could be confirmed with the modeling approach. An increase in peak water demand by 3.5% compared to the reference period was estimated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available