4.6 Article

Risk Analysis of Heavy Metal Accumulation from Sewage Sludge of Selected Wastewater Treatment Plants in Poland

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13152070

Keywords

heavy metals; sewage sludge; mobility; geoaccumulation index; potential ecological risk index; environmental risk determinant

Funding

  1. Programme of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education-the Regional Initiative of Excellence
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [025/RID/2018/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants contains heavy metals that may affect soil quality. However, a study showed that even with potential risks and geoaccumulation indicators, as long as the heavy metals are in immovable fractions, sludge can still be used for fertilization purposes.
Sewage sludge (SS) from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has important soil-forming and fertilizing properties. However, it may not always be used for this purpose. One of the main reasons why SS cannot be used for natural purposes is its heavy metal (HM) content. SS from the wastewater treatment plant in Poland was subjected to an analysis of the potential anthropogenic hazard of HMs, especially in terms of their mobility and accumulation in soil. Calculations were made for the concentrations of HMs in SS from the analyzed wastewater treatment plants and in arable soil from measurement points in places of its potential use. The geoaccumulation index (GAI), potential environmental risk index (PERI), risk assessment code (RAC) and environmental risk determinant (ERD) were calculated. Then the values of the indicators were compared with the mobility of HMs, which was the highest risk of soil contamination. It was shown that a high level of potential risk and geoaccumulation indicators did not necessarily disqualify the use of SS, provided that HMs were in immovable fractions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available