4.6 Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cell-based interventions in experimental diabetic kidney disease

Journal

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages 1304-1319

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.19-0419

Keywords

apoptosis; chronic kidney disease; diabetes; diabetic nephropathy; inflammation; mesenchymal stem cells; extracellular vesicles; stem cells; umbilical cord blood

Funding

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  2. Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery
  3. Mayo Clinic CCaTS [UL1TR002377]
  4. NIDDK Diabetes Complications Consortium [DK115255, DK076169]
  5. National Institute of Health (NIH) [DK101405, DK118120, DK07013, DK102325, DK123492, DK109134]
  6. Mayo Clinic Florida Center for Regenerative Medicine
  7. Regenerative Medicine Minnesota [RMM 091718CT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell-based interventions showed significant improvement in kidney function and reduction in injury in diabetic animal models of kidney disease. Treatment-related factors, such as cell type, tissue source, cell dose, and administration route, played a role in modifying treatment effects.
Regenerative, cell-based therapy is a promising treatment option for diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which has no cure. To prepare for clinical translation, this systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the effect of cell-based interventions in DKD animal models and treatment-related factors modifying outcomes. Electronic databases were searched for original investigations applying cell-based therapy in diabetic animals with kidney endpoints (January 1998-May 2019). Weighted or standardized mean differences were estimated for kidney outcomes and pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses tested treatment-related factor effects for outcomes (creatinine, urea, urine protein, fibrosis, and inflammation). In 40 studies (992 diabetic rodents), therapy included mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC; 61%), umbilical cord/amniotic fluid cells (UC/AF; 15%), non-MSC (15%), and cell-derived products (13%). Tissue sources included bone marrow (BM; 65%), UC/AF (15%), adipose (9%), and others (11%). Cell-based therapy significantly improved kidney function while reducing injury markers (proteinuria, histology, fibrosis, inflammation, apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal-transition, oxidative stress). Preconditioning, xenotransplantation, and disease-source approaches were effective. MSC and UC/AF cells had greater effect on kidney function while cell products improved fibrosis. BM and UC/AF tissue sources more effectively improved kidney function and proteinuria vs adipose or other tissues. Cell dose, frequency, and administration route also imparted different benefits. In conclusion, cell-based interventions in diabetic animals improved kidney function and reduced injury with treatment-related factors modifying these effects. These findings may aid in development of optimal repair strategies through selective use of cells/products, tissue sources, and dose administrations to allow for successful adaptation of this novel therapeutic in human DKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available