4.7 Article

Evaluation of the MODIS (C6) Daily Albedo Products for Livingston Island, Antarctic

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13122357

Keywords

albedo; Antarctica; MODIS snow albedo; in-situ albedo; albedo trend

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, project PERMASNOW [CTM2014-52021-R]
  2. University of Oviedo, Spain [GR-2016-0005]
  3. Government of the Principality of Asturias [BP17-151]
  4. University of Oviedo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared MODIS albedo products over Antarctica with in situ data, finding that MOD10A1 had the best correlation in clear-sky conditions. It also concluded that MODIS products can accurately describe the trend of in situ albedo data.
Although extensive research of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) albedo data is available on the Greenland Ice Sheet, there is a lack of studies evaluating MODIS albedo products over Antarctica. In this paper, MOD10A1, MYD10A1, and MCD43 (C6) daily albedo products were compared with the in situ albedo data on Livingston Island, South Shetland Islands (SSI), Antarctica, from 2006 to 2015, for both all-sky and clear-sky conditions, and for the entire study period and only the southern summer months. This is the first evaluation in which MYD10A1 and MCD43 are also included, which can be used to improve the accuracy of the snow BRDF/albedo modeling. The best correlation was obtained with MOD10A1 in clear-sky conditions (r = 0.7 and RMSE = 0.042). With MCD43, only data from the backup algorithm could be used, so the correlations obtained were lower (r = 0.6). However, it was found that there was no significant difference between the values obtained for all-sky and for clear-sky data. In addition, the MODIS products were found to describe the in situ data trend, with increasing albedo values in the range between 0.04 decade(-1) and 0.16 decade(-1). We conclude that MODIS daily albedo products can be applied to study the albedo in the study area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available