4.7 Article

Some Peculiarities of Arable Soil Organic Matter Detection Using Optical Remote Sensing Data

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13122313

Keywords

rainfall impact; soil surface; soil organic matter; Sentinel-2

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia [075-15-2020-909]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rainfall has a negative impact on the accuracy of soil organic matter detection and mapping using optical remote sensing data. However, incorporating information on soil surface state can improve the accuracy of the detection based on Sentinel-2 data.
Optical remote sensing only provides information about the very thin surface layer of soil. Rainfall splash alters soil surface properties and its spectral reflectance. We analyzed the impact of rainfall on the success of soil organic matter (SOM) content (% by mass) detection and mapping based on optical remote sensing data. The subject of the study was the arable soils of a test field located in the Tula region (Russia), their spectral reflectance, and Sentinel-2 data. Our research demonstrated that rainfall negatively affects the accuracy of SOM predictions based on Sentinel-2 data. Depending on the average precipitation per day, the R(2)cv of models varied from 0.67 to 0.72, RMSEcv from 0.64 to 1.1% and RPIQ from 1.4 to 2.3. The incorporation of information on the soil surface state in the model resulted in an increase in accuracy of SOM content detection based on Sentinel-2 data: the R(2)cv of the models increased up to 0.78 to 0.84, the RMSEcv decreased to 0.61 to 0.71%, and the RPIQ increased to 2.1 to 2.4. Further studies are necessary to identify how the SOM content and composition of the soil surface change under the influence of rainfall for other soils, and to determine the relationships between rainfall-induced SOM changes and soil surface spectral reflectance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available