4.7 Article

Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Lunar Crater Detection Using CE-2 DOM

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13142819

Keywords

crater detection; Crater R-CNN; Mask R-CNN; Two-Teachers Self-training with Noise (TTSN); DOM; CE-2; deep learning; semi-supervised

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2010AA122202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new crater detection model, which achieves high accuracy by manually labeling a large amount of training data and utilizing the Two-Teachers Self-training with Noise method. The model can effectively extract crater information from DOM data, performing well in detecting small craters.
Lunar craters are very important for estimating the geological age of the Moon, studying the evolution of the Moon, and for landing site selection. Due to a lack of labeled samples, processing times due to high-resolution imagery, the small number of suitable detection models, and the influence of solar illumination, Crater Detection Algorithms (CDAs) based on Digital Orthophoto Maps (DOMs) have not yet been well-developed. In this paper, a large number of training data are labeled manually in the Highland and Maria regions, using the Chang'E-2 (CE-2) DOM; however, the labeled data cannot cover all kinds of crater types. To solve the problem of small crater detection, a new crater detection model (Crater R-CNN) is proposed, which can effectively extract the spatial and semantic information of craters from DOM data. As incomplete labeled samples are not conducive for model training, the Two-Teachers Self-training with Noise (TTSN) method is used to train the Crater R-CNN model, thus constructing a new model-called Crater R-CNN with TTSN-which can achieve state-of-the-art performance. To evaluate the accuracy of the model, three other detection models (Mask R-CNN, no-Mask R-CNN, and Crater R-CNN) based on semi-supervised deep learning were used to detect craters in the Highland and Maria regions. The results indicate that Crater R-CNN with TTSN achieved the highest precision (of 91.4% and 88.5%, respectively) in the Highland and Maria regions, even obtaining the highest recall and F1 score. Compared with Mask R-CNN, no-Mask R-CNN, and Crater R-CNN, Crater R-CNN with TTSN had strong robustness and better generalization ability for crater detection within 1 km in different terrains, making it possible to detect small craters with high accuracy when using DOM data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available