4.7 Review

Design Engineering, Synthesis Protocols, and Energy Applications of MOF-Derived Electrocatalysts

Journal

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00656-w

Keywords

MOF-derived electrocatalysis; Oxygen reduction reaction; Oxygen evolution reaction; Hydrogen evolution reaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22075223, 51701146]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The significant progress of MOFs-derived electrocatalysts in ORR, OER, and HER applications is mainly attributed to their high-porosity structure, large surface area, and abundant active centers.
The core reactions for fuel cells, rechargeable metal-air batteries, and hydrogen fuel production are the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), which are heavily dependent on the efficiency of electrocatalysts. Enormous attempts have previously been devoted in non-noble electrocatalysts born out of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for ORR, OER, and HER applications, due to the following advantageous reasons: (i) The significant porosity eases the electrolyte diffusion; (ii) the supreme catalyst-electrolyte contact area enhances the diffusion efficiency; and (iii) the electronic conductivity can be extensively increased owing to the unique construction block subunits for MOFs-derived electrocatalysis. Herein, the recent progress of MOFs-derived electrocatalysts including synthesis protocols, design engineering, DFT calculations roles, and energy applications is discussed and reviewed. It can be concluded that the elevated ORR, OER, and HER performances are attributed to an advantageously well-designed high-porosity structure, significant surface area, and plentiful active centers. Furthermore, the perspectives of MOF-derived electrocatalysts for the ORR, OER, and HER are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available