4.4 Article

Fine-Scale Human Population Structure in Southern Africa Reflects Ecogeographic Boundaries

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 204, Issue 1, Pages 303-+

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.187369

Keywords

ancestry; population structure; KhoeSan; pastoralism

Funding

  1. Stanford University Center on the Demographics and Economics of Health and Aging CDEHA seed grant [NIA P30 AG017253-12]
  2. Stanford University Computation, Evolutionary, and Human Genomics trainee research grant
  3. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  4. [32]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent genetic studies have established that the KhoeSan populations of southern Africa are distinct from all other African populations and have remained largely isolated during human prehistory until approximate to 2000 years ago. Dozens of different KhoeSan groups exist, belonging to three different language families, but very little is known about their population history. We examine new genome-wide polymorphism data and whole mitochondrial genomes for >100 South Africans from the Khomani San and Nama populations of the Northern Cape, analyzed in conjunction with 19 additional southern African populations. Our analyses reveal fine-scale population structure in and around the Kalahari Desert. Surprisingly, this structure does not always correspond to linguistic or subsistence categories as previously suggested, but rather reflects the role of geographic barriers and the ecology of the greater Kalahari Basin. Regardless of subsistence strategy, the indigenous Khoe-speaking Nama pastoralists and the N|u-speaking Khomani (formerly hunter-gatherers) share ancestry with other Khoe-speaking forager populations that form a rim around the Kalahari Desert. We reconstruct earlier migration patterns and estimate that the southern Kalahari populations were among the last to experience gene flow from Bantu speakers, approximate to 14 generations ago. We conclude that local adoption of pastoralism, at least by the Nama, appears to have been primarily a cultural process with limited genetic impact from eastern Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available