4.4 Article

Covariance Association Test (CVAT) Identifies Genetic Markers Associated with Schizophrenia in Functionally Associated Biological Processes

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 203, Issue 4, Pages 1901-+

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.189498

Keywords

GBLUP; schizophrenia; complex disease; set test; association test

Funding

  1. Center for Genomic Selection in Animals and Plants - Danish Council for Strategic Research [12-132452]
  2. Faculty of Health Sciences
  3. Centre for Integrative Sequencing at Aarhus University
  4. Lundbeck Foundation
  5. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2014-1724] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Schizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder with large personal and social costs, and understanding the genetic etiology is important. Such knowledge can be obtained by testing the association between a disease phenotype and individual genetic markers; however, such single-marker methods have limited power to detect genetic markers with small effects. Instead, aggregating genetic markers based on biological information might increase the power to identify sets of genetic markers of etiological significance. Several set test methods have been proposed: Here we propose a new set test derived from genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), the covariance association test (CVAT). We compared the performance of CVAT to other commonly used set tests. The comparison was conducted using a simulated study population having the same genetic parameters as for schizophrenia. We found that CVAT was among the top performers. When extending CVAT to utilize a mixture of SNP effects, we found an increase in power to detect the causal sets. Applying the methods to a Danish schizophrenia case-control data set, we found genomic evidence for association of schizophrenia with vitamin A metabolism and immunological responses, which previously have been implicated with schizophrenia based on experimental and observational studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available