4.3 Review

Cancer Incidence of Finnish Sami in the Light of Exposure to Radioactive Fallout

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18158186

Keywords

Finnish Sami; radioactive fallout; cancer risk

Funding

  1. University of Helsinki

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research suggests that Finnish Sami people have a lower overall cancer risk, with certain exceptions such as stomach cancer among the Skolt Sami. Common cancers among the Finnish main population, such as prostate, breast, and skin cancer, are particularly rare among the Finnish Sami. Despite changing lifestyles and environments, the cancer mortality rate among the Sami people today is similar to that of the majority of the Finnish and western populations.
This article summarizes the results of studies on the exposure of the Finnish Sami people to radioactive fallout and the estimations of the related cancer risk. We also discuss the lifestyle, genetic origin and diet of this population. The Sami people are an indigenous people who live in the northern part of Scandinavia and Finland. The review is based on the available scientific literature of Finnish Sami. The traditional Sami diet, high in animal products, persists in Sami groups still involved in reindeer-herding, but others have adopted the typical diet of western cultures. Studies have consistently shown an overall reduced cancer risk among the Finnish Sami people, except for stomach cancer among the Skolt Sami. Common cancers among the Finnish main population, such as prostate, breast and skin cancer are especially rare among the Finnish Sami. The incidence of cancer among the Finnish Sami are mostly similar to those of the Swedish and Norwegian Sami. To conclude, we observed no effect of radioactive pollution on cancer incidence. The lifestyles and environments of the Sami are changing, and their cancer mortality rate today is similar to that of the majority of the Finnish and western population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available