4.3 Article

Oral Health as a Predictor of Physical Frailty among Rural Community-Dwelling Elderly in an Agricultural County of Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Study

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189805

Keywords

oral health; physical frailty; rural elderly; agricultural

Funding

  1. CHING PAO P.D. Charitable Foundation, Taiwan [SCRPF6J0062]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [108-2314-B-255-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study clarified the relationship between oral health and physical frailty, finding that restricted food types, self-reported dental status, number of teeth, tooth cleaning frequency, OHAT score, and saliva items were significantly associated with physical frailty. Longitudinal analyses are needed to further understand the risk factors for frailty onset.
We conducted a cross-sectional study to clarify the relationship between oral health and physical frailty (PF). A sample of 903 community-dwelling individuals aged >= 65 years were enrolled from random communities in Chiayi County. The self-perceived oral health (SPOH) and oral health assessment tool (OHAT), which consists of eight items, was used for the evaluation of their oral health status. PF was assessed based on the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture index. Overall, 14.6% of the participants had PF. In an adjusted model, restricted food types (odds ratio (OR) = 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-2.09, p = 0.001), self-reported dental status (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.2-2.15, p = 0.001), number of teeth (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99, p = 0.006), frequency of tooth cleaning (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.68-1.0, p = 0.049), OHAT score (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17, p < 0.017), and saliva items of OHAT (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.11-2.1, p = 0.010) were significantly associated with PF. SPOH is a crucial indicator of PF; longitudinal analyses are necessary to understand the underlying pathway of risk factors for frailty onset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available