4.5 Article

Prioritizing and implementing HPV vaccination quality improvement programs in healthcare systems: the perspective of quality improvement leaders

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 3577-3586

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1913965

Keywords

healthcare systems; HPV vaccination; quality improvement; cancer prevention; primary care

Funding

  1. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Developmental Grant
  2. National Cancer Institute [R21 CA241518]
  3. Cancer Control Education Program at UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center [T32CA057726-28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Healthcare systems are crucial partners in implementing HPV vaccination quality improvement programs. While most QI leaders endorse the benefits of HPV vaccination, concerns exist such as small adolescent patient populations, lack of provider buy-in, and competing priorities in health services. Barriers to implementing HPV vaccine QI programs include limited data systems, time constraints, and fee-for-service pressures, while facilitators include automation and passionate vaccine champions.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination could prevent most of the similar to 34,000 HPV-attributable cancers diagnosed annually in the US, but uptake remains suboptimal. Healthcare systems are key partners in implementing HPV vaccination quality improvement (QI) programs. To inform future system-level HPV vaccine initiatives, we sought to understand HPV vaccine QI from the perspective of QI program leaders in healthcare systems. We conducted telephone interviews with a multi-state sample of 17 QI leaders in 15 systems. We analyzed data qualitatively via thematic analysis to describe QI leaders' perspectives on prioritizing and implementing HPV vaccine QI. All QI leaders endorsed HPV vaccination as beneficial, and some had already prioritized increasing uptake to improve adolescent health and meet payor reimbursement standards. Those not prioritizing HPV vaccination cited concerns including the relatively small size of adolescent patient populations, lack of buy-in among providers, and the need to focus on health services perceived as more profitable or urgent. When implementing HPV vaccine QI programs, QI leaders reported key barriers to be the lack of robust data systems and acceptable QI metrics, limited time, and pressures of a fee-for-service clinical environment. Facilitators included automation and standardization in QI efforts and passionate vaccine champions. Almost all QI leaders reported future plans to implement HPV vaccine QI projects. Findings suggest that many healthcare systems are motivated to improve HPV vaccination. However, resistance to guideline-consistent quality metrics, the narrow target of one vaccine in the adolescent patient population, payment structures, and constrained time of providers are key barriers to practice improvements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available