Journal
FORESTS
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f12070955
Keywords
individual-based model; mangrove forest; red mangrove; crown plasticity; classical competition theory; resource competition theory; local interaction; local seed dispersal
Categories
Funding
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG BE 1960/7-1]
- Belgian Science Policy [SR/00/323]
- European Commission [247514]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Through simulation studies, it was found that classical competition theory is more suitable for explaining the competitive dynamics between red mangrove species, while inter-specific crown plasticity affects their spatial distribution. Local competition and global or localized seed dispersal will have effects on species coexistence.
(1,2) In this theoretical study, we apply MesoFON, a field-calibrated individual-based model of mangrove forest dynamics, and its Lotka-Volterra interpretations to address two questions: (a) Do the dynamics of two identical red mangrove species that compete for light resources and avoid inter-specific competition by lateral crown displacement follow the predictions of classical competition theory or resource competition theory? (b) Which mechanisms drive the dynamics in the presence of inter-specific crown plasticity when local competition is combined with global or with localized seed dispersal? (3) In qualitative support of classical competition theory, the two species can stably coexist within MesoFON. However, the total standing stock at equilibrium matched the carrying capacity of the single species. Therefore, a non-overyielding Lotka-Volterra model rather than the classic one approximated best the observed behavior. Mechanistically, inter-specific crown plasticity moved heterospecific trees apart and pushed conspecifics together. Despite local competition, the community exhibited mean-field dynamics with global dispersal. In comparison, localized dispersal slowed down the dynamics by diminishing the strength of intra-/inter-specific competition and their difference due to a restriction in the competitive race to the mean-field that prevails between conspecific clusters. (4) As the outcome in field-calibrated IBMs is mediated by the competition for resources, we conclude that classical competition mechanisms can override those of resource competition, and more species are likely to successfully coexist within communities.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available