4.7 Article

Acoustic Properties of Larch Bark Panels

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f12070887

Keywords

bark-based panels; acoustic performance; sound absorption coefficient; sustainable materials; construction materials

Categories

Funding

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-18-0378, APVV-19-0269, VEGA1/0717/19, VEGA1/0714/21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that bark-based boards with fine-grained particles have better sound absorption coefficient values compared with coarse-grained particles. It is not recommended to use bark composites mixed with popcorn bonded with UF. The best density of bark boards to obtain the best sound absorption coefficients is around 350 kg/m(3).
The potential of tree bark, a by-product of the woodworking industry, has been studied for more than seven decades. Bark, as a sustainable raw material, can replace wood or other resources in numerous applications in construction. In this study, the acoustic properties of bark-based panels were analyzed. The roles of the particle size (4-11 mm and 10-30 mm), particle orientation (parallel and perpendicular) and density (350-700 kg/m(3)) of samples with 30 mm and 60 mm thicknesses were studied at frequencies ranging from 50 to 6400 Hz. Bark-based boards with fine-grained particles have been shown to be better in terms of sound absorption coefficient values compared with coarse-grained particles. Bark composites mixed with popcorn bonded with UF did not return the expected results, and it is not possible to recommend this solution. The best density of bark boards to obtain the best sound absorption coefficients is about 350 kg/m(3). These lightweight panels achieved better sound-absorbing properties (especially at lower frequencies) at higher thicknesses. The noise reduction coefficient of 0.5 obtained a sample with fine particles with a parallel orientation and a density of around 360 kg/m(3).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available