4.7 Article

Influence of INGER and TORDIS Energetic Willow Clones Planted on Contaminated Soil on the Survival Rates, Yields and Calorific Value

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f12070826

Keywords

Salix viminalis; Osier willow; Tordis clone; Inger clone; degraded soil; calorific value; biomass

Categories

Funding

  1. Transilvania University of Brasov

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper examines the forestry aspects of using Inger and Tordis willow clones to obtain woody biomass and remediate degraded soils. Results showed that degraded soils negatively affected survival rates and biomass quantities, but enriched nutrients in the soil. The study concludes that using willow clones is a viable solution for obtaining energetic biomass and improving the productivity of degraded soils.
The paper presents some forestry aspects of using Inger and Tordis willow clones to obtain woody biomass and remedy degraded soils. The methodological aspects regarding the planting of willow seedlings, the evaluation of the survival rate, the evaluation of the biomass quantity and the enrichment of the soil are analyzed. The results of the experiments showed that the degraded soil decreased the viability rate of the cuttings by 16.6% for the Tordis clone and 35.8 for the Inger clone. The analysis of the soil samples showed that it was enriched in nutrients after 2 years of cultivation, by the decomposition of the fallen leaves on the soil and by the absorption of the substances from the soil. Regarding the amount of biomass, its mass per hectare after the first year of cultivation was 0.64 t/ha for the Inger clone and 0.66 t/ha for the Tordis clone, while the calorific values of 19,376 kJ/kg for Inger and 19,355 kJ/kg for Tordis were good values. The final conclusion of the paper highlights that Osier willow is a viable solution for obtaining energetic biomass and putting it back into the productive circuit of degraded soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available