4.5 Article

Aortic flow dynamics and stiffness in Loeys-Dietz syndrome patients: a comparison with healthy volunteers and Marfan syndrome patients

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 641-649

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab069

Keywords

Loeys-Dietz syndrome; Marfan syndrome; rotational flow; aortic stiffness; 4D flow CMR; pulse wave velocity

Funding

  1. La Marato de TV3 [20151330]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI17/00381]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [IJC2018-037349-I]
  4. Cardiopath PhD programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aortic stiffness is higher in Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) patients, with reduced rotational flow and abnormal wall shear stress compared to healthy volunteers (HV). However, LDS patients showed similar aortic stiffness and overlapping aortic flow features when compared to Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients.
Aims To assess aortic flow and stiffness in patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) by 4D flow and cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the results with those of healthy volunteers (HV) and Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients. Methods and results Twenty-one LDS and 44 MFS patients with no previous aortic dissection or surgery and 35 HV underwent non-contrast-enhanced 4D flow CMR. In-plane rotational flow (IRF), systolic flow reversal ratio (SFRR), and aortic diameters were obtained at 20 planes from the ascending (AAo) to the proximal descending aorta (DAo). IRF and SFRR were also quantified for aortic regions (proximal and distal AAo, arch and proximal DAo). Peak-systolic wall shear stress (WSS) maps were also estimated. Aortic stiffness was quantified using pulse wave velocity (PWV) and proximal AAo longitudinal strain. Compared to HV, LDS patients had lower rotational flow at the distal AAo (P = 0.002), arch (P = 0.002), and proximal DAo (P < 0.001) even after adjustment for age, stroke volume, and local diameter. LDS patients had higher SFRR in the proximal DAo compared to both HV (P = 0.024) and MFS patients (P = 0.015), even after adjustment for age and local diameter. Axial and circumferential WSS in LDS patients were lower than in HV. AAo circumferential WSS was lower in LDS compared to MFS patients. AAo and DAo PWV and proximal AAo longitudinal strain revealed stiffer aortas in LDS patients compared to HV (P = 0.007, 0.005, and 0.029, respectively) but no differences vs. MFS patients. Conclusion Greater aortic stiffness as well as impaired IRF and WSS were present in LDS patients compared to HV. Conversely, similar aortic stiffness and overlapping aortic flow features were found in Loeys-Dietz and Marfan patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available