4.5 Article

Association of coronary artery calcium score with qualitatively and quantitatively assessed adverse plaque on coronary CT angiography in the SCOT-HEART trial

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1210-1221

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab135

Keywords

coronary calcium score; low-attenuation plaque; computed tomography; computed tomography coronary angiography; atherosclerotic plaque

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates [CZH/4/588]
  2. Edinburgh and Lothian's Health Foundation Trust
  3. Heart Diseases Research Fund
  4. Carnegie Trust Vacation Scholarship [VAC009640]
  5. British Heart Foundation [FS/ICRF/20/26002, CH/09/002, FS/11/014, FS/16/14/32023, RG/20/10/34966, RE/18/5/34216, RG/16/10/32375, FS/14/78/31020, AA/18/3/34220]
  6. Butler Senior Clinical Research Fellowship [FS/16/14/32023]
  7. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health [PCL/17/04]
  8. Wellcome Trust [WT103782AIA]
  9. Scottish Imaging Network: A Platform of Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE)
  10. National Heart Foundation of New Zealand Senior Fellowship [1844]
  11. Sir Jules Thorn Biomedical Research Award 2015 [15/JTA]
  12. Royal Bank of Scotland
  13. National Health Service Research Scotland (NRS) through National Health Service Lothian Health Board
  14. National Health Service Research Scotland (NRS)
  15. National Institute of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1R01HL148787-01A1, 1R01HL151266]
  16. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronary artery calcification is a marker of cardiovascular risk, but its association with different plaque subtypes is unclear. In stable chest pain patients, having a zero CACS does not guarantee a perfect prognosis and cannot rule out obstructive coronary artery disease, non-obstructive plaque, or adverse plaque phenotypes such as low-attenuation plaque.
Aims Coronary artery calcification is a marker of cardiovascular risk, but its association with qualitatively and quantitatively assessed plaque subtypes is unknown. Methods and results In this post-hoc analysis, computed tomography (CT) images and 5-year clinical outcomes were assessed in SCOT-HEART trial participants. Agatston coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was measured on non-contrast CT and was stratified as zero (0 Agatston units, AU), minimal (1-9 AU), low (10-99 AU), moderate (100-399 AU), high (400-999 AU), and very high (>= 1000 AU). Adverse plaques were investigated by qualitative (visual categorization of positive remodelling, low-attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, and napkin ring sign) and quantitative (calcified, non-calcified, low-attenuation, and total plaque burden; Autoplaque) assessments. Of 1769 patients, 36% had a zero, 9% minimal, 20% low, 17% moderate, 10% high, and 8% very high CACS. Amongst patients with a zero CACS, 14% had non-obstructive disease, 2% had obstructive disease, 2% had visually assessed adverse plaques, and 13% had low-attenuation plaque burden >4%. Non-calcified and low-attenuation plaque burden increased between patients with zero, minimal, and low CACS (P < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference between those with medium, high, and very high CACS. Myocardial infarction occurred in 41 patients, 10% of whom had zero CACS. CACS >1000 AU and low-attenuation plaque burden were the only predictors of myocardial infarction, independent of obstructive disease, and 10-year cardiovascular risk score. Conclusion In patients with stable chest pain, zero CACS is associated with a good but not perfect prognosis, and CACS cannot rule out obstructive coronary artery disease, non-obstructive plaque, or adverse plaque phenotypes, including low-attenuation plaque.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available