4.8 Article

PBRM1 loss in kidney cancer unbalances the proximal tubule master transcription factor hub to repress proximal tubule differentiation

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109747

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [PO1 HL146372]
  2. National Cancer Institute [P30 CA043703, RO1 CA204373]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that PAX8 recruits PBRM1/PBAF in clear cell renal cell cancers (RCCs) and corepressors are more conspicuous in RCC cells, opposing the function of coactivators. Key PAX8 target genes are repressed in RCC compared to normal kidneys, and reintroduction of PBRM1 or depletion of opposing corepressors can correct the coregulator imbalance.
PBRM1, a subunit of the PBAF coactivator complex that transcription factors use to activate target genes, is genetically inactivated in almost all clear cell renal cell cancers (RCCs). Using unbiased proteomic analyses, we find that PAX8, a master transcription factor driver of proximal tubule epithelial fates, recruits PBRM1/PBAF. Reverse analyses of the PAX8 interactome confirm recruitment specifically of PBRM1/PBAF and not functionally similar BAF. More conspicuous in the PAX8 hub in RCC cells, however, are corepressors, which functionally oppose coactivators. Accordingly, key PAX8 target genes are repressed in RCC versus normal kidneys, with the loss of histone lysine-27 acetylation, but intact lysine-4 trimethylation, activation marks. Re-introduction of PBRM1, or depletion of opposing corepressors using siRNA or drugs, redress coregulator imbalance and release RCC cells to terminal epithelial fates. These mechanisms thus explain RCC resemblance to the proximal tubule lineage but with suppression of the late-epithelial program that normally terminates lineage-precursor proliferation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available