4.5 Article

Life-Sustaining Treatment States in Korean Cancer Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 908-916

Publisher

KOREAN CANCER ASSOCIATION
DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.325

Keywords

Life-sustaining treatment; Life-sustaining treatment decisions law; Cancer deaths

Categories

Funding

  1. [NA19-008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed the state of life-sustaining treatment decisions in Korea after the enactment of the law, and found that while patients had a high rate of self-determination, there were still issues with the implementation of the law process and variations in advanced medical treatments.
Purpose In Korea, the Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life was enacted on February 4, 2018. This study was conducted to analyze the current state of life-sustaining treatment decisions based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data after the law came into force. Materials and Methods The data of 173,028 cancer deaths were extracted from NHIS qualification data between November 2015 and January 2019. Results The number of cancer deaths complied with the law process was 14,438 of 54,635 cases (26.4%). The rate of patient self-determination was 49.0%. The patients complying with the law process have used a hospice center more frequently (28% vs. 14%). However, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the patients who complied with and without the law process (ICU admission, 23% vs. 21%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis in the comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the law and the analysis according to the compliance with the law. The patients who complied with the law process received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a lower rate. Conclusion The law has positive effects on the rate of life-sustaining treatment decision by patient's determination. However, there was no sufficient effect on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, which could protect the patient from unneces-sary or harmful interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available