4.6 Review

Corneal endothelial cell density loss following glaucoma surgery alone or in combination with cataract surgery: a systematic review protocol

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050992

Keywords

glaucoma; cataract and refractive surgery; ophthalmology

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  2. UK Medical Research Council
  3. Moorfields Eye Charity
  4. Michael and Ilse Katz Foundation
  5. Helen Hamlyn Trust
  6. Fight for Sight (UK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to assess and compare corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss in patients following glaucoma surgery and cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria involve adult patients with various types of glaucoma who have undergone specific types of surgeries, while excluding those with pre-existing corneal disease. The study will search electronic databases for relevant literature, extract data, and analyze outcomes to be published and disseminated in ophthalmic networks.
Objective We aim to systematically assess and compare corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss in patients with glaucoma following glaucoma surgery and cataract surgery. Introduction Corneal ECD loss may occur due to intraoperative surgical trauma in glaucoma surgery or postoperatively with chronic endothelial cell trauma or irritation. Corneal oedema and decompensation after aqueous shunt glaucoma surgery has been reported but the long-term ECD loss is still unknown. Inclusion criteria Trabeculectomy, glaucoma filtration surgery or microinvasive glaucoma surgery in adults with ocular hypertension, primary and secondary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma. Participants with pre-existing corneal disease will be excluded. Glaucoma laser treatments and peripheral iridotomy will be excluded. The outcomes include preoperative and postoperative corneal ECD, percentage change of corneal ECD and adverse events. Methods We will conduct an electronic database search for randomised controlled trials, prospective non-randomised studies, observational studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Eligibility criteria will include quantitative articles published after and including the year 2000, written in English and containing data on ECD loss. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and extract data from full texts, reporting outcomes according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extraction of key characteristics will be completed using customised forms. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal forms. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this review, as it will only include published data. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated across ophthalmic networks. PROSPERO registration number PROSPERO CRD42020192303.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available