4.6 Article

General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045050

Keywords

primary care; information technology; quality in health care

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC) programme grant [PSTRC2016-004]
  2. NIHR Doctoral Research Fellowship [DRF-2017-10-181]
  3. NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Centre
  4. Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust and Imperial College London
  5. Department of Primary Care and Public Health, within the School of Public Health, Imperial College London
  6. Dr Foster Intelligence, an independent health service research organisation
  7. Department of Primary Care & Public Health at Imperial College London
  8. NW London NIHR Applied Research Collaboration
  9. Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  10. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [DRF-2017-10-181] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that although participants believed reminders were important in their clinical systems, an average of 70% of reminders were ignored. Factors influencing their reaction to reminders included experience, consultation styles, and interests. Negative consequences of using reminders included increased workload, costs, and compromising healthcare providers' behavior.
Objectives Reminders in primary care administrative systems aim to help clinicians provide evidence-based care, prescribe safely and save money. However, increased use of reminders can lead to alert fatigue. Our study aimed to assess general practitioners' (GPs) and nurse practitioners' (NPs) views on electronic reminders in primary care. Design A qualitative analysis using semistructured interviews. Setting and participants Fifteen GPs and NP based in general practices located in North-West London and Yorkshire, England. Methods We collected data on participants' views on: (1) perceptions of the value of information provided; (2) reminder-related behaviours and (3) how to improve reminders. We carried out a thematic analysis. Results Participants were familiar with reminders in their clinical systems and felt many were important to support their clinical work. However, participants reported, on average, 70% of reminders were ignored. Four major themes emerged: (1) reaction to a reminder, which was mixed and varied by situation. (2) Factors influencing the decision to act on reminders, often related to experience, consultation styles and interests of participants. Time constraints, alert design, inappropriate presentation and litigation were also factors. (3) Negative consequences of using reminders were increased workload or costs and compromising GP and NPs behaviour. (4) Factors relating to improving users' engagement with reminders were prevention of unnecessary reminders through data linkage across healthcare administrative systems or the development of more intelligent algorithms. Participants felt training was vital to effectively manage reminders. Conclusions GPs and NPs believe reminders are useful in supporting the provision of good quality patient care. Improving GPs and NPs' engagement with reminders centres on further developing their relevance to their clinical practice, which is personalised, considers cognitive workflow and suppresses inappropriate presentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available