4.5 Article

Comparison of the efficacy of laser-activated and ultrasonic-activated techniques for the removal of tricalcium silicate-based sealers and gutta-percha in root canal retreatment: a microtomography and scanning electron microscopy study

Journal

BMC ORAL HEALTH
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01638-5

Keywords

Passive ultrasonic irrigation; Photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming; Endodontic retreatment; iRoot SP; Micro-CT; Scanning electron microscopy

Funding

  1. Guangdong Financial Fund for High-Caliber Hospital Construction [174-2018-XMZC-0001-03-0125/A-01, 174-2018-XMZC-0001-03-0125/D-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laser-activated and ultrasonic-activated techniques in vitro for the removal of tricalcium silicate-based sealer iRoot SP and gutta-percha after standard canal retreatment procedures using nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments. The combination of these techniques with NiTi re-instrumentation to remove residual filling materials has not been compared yet.
Background Tricalcium silicate-based sealers have been usually indicated for the single-cone technique and result in more residual filling materials in root canal retreatment. Passive ultrasonic irrigation and photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming have been reported to improve the removal efficacy of root canal filling materials. However, the abilities of both techniques combined with NiTi re-instrumentation to remove residual tricalcium silicate-based sealer and gutta-percha have not been compared. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laser-activated and ultrasonic-activated techniques in vitro for the removal of the tricalcium silicate-based sealer iRoot SP and gutta-percha after standard canal retreatment procedures with the use of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available