4.7 Article

Role of Chain Entanglements in the Stereocomplex Crystallization between Poly(lactic acid) Enantiomers

Journal

ACS MACRO LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 1023-1028

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00394

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21873083, 22073083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the crucial role of chain entanglement in regulating stereocomplex (SC) crystallization of polymer enantiomers. Deentangling was shown to promote both the crystallization rate and crystallinity of SCs, providing deep insight into the SC crystallization mechanism of polymers and paving the way for future research in preparing SC materials.
Stereocomplex (SC) crystallization between polymer enantiomers has opened a promising avenue for preparing high-performance materials. However, high-crystallinity SCs are difficult to achieve for high-molecular-weight (HMW) enantiomeric blends of chiral polymers [e.g., poly(lactic acid)]. Despite extensive studies, why HMW enantiomeric blends have difficulty in SC crystallization has not been clarified. Herein, we chose the HMW poly(L-lactic acid)/poly(D-lactic acid) (PLLA/PDLA) 1/1 blend as the model system and demonstrated the crucial role of chain entanglement in regulating SC crystallization. PLLA/PDLA blends with various entanglement degrees were prepared by freeze-drying. We observed that disentangling promoted not only the crystallization rate but also the crystallinity of SCs in both the nonisothermal and isothermal processes. The less-entangled samples crystallized exclusively as the high-crystallinity SCs at different temperatures, in contrast to the predominant homocrystallization that occurred in the common entangled samples. This study provides deep insight into the SC crystallization mechanism of polymers and paves the way for future research attempting to prepare SC materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available