4.5 Article

Automated Collateral Flow Assessment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Computed Tomography with Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages E748-E760

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.136

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Brain; Computed tomography perfusion; Ischemic stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated the successful use of artificial intelligence algorithms in evaluating collateral circulation in AIS patients, providing an effective tool for determining reperfusion-eligible patients.
BACKGROUND: Collateral circulation is associated with improved functional outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who undergo reperfusion therapy. Assessment of collateral flow can be time consuming, subjective, and difficult because of complex neurovasculature. This study assessed the ability of multiple artificial intelligence algorithms in determining collateral flow of patients with AIS. METHODS: Two hundred patients with AIS between March 2019 and January 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Peak arterial computed tomography perfusion volumes were used to assess collateral scores. Neural networks were developed for dichotomized (double dagger 50% or <50%) and multiclass (0% filling, 0%-50% filling, 50%100% filling, or 100% filling) collateral scoring. Maximum intensity projections from axial and anteroposterior (AP) views were synthesized for each bone subtracted threedimensional volume and used as network inputs separately and together, along with three-dimensional data. Training:testing:validation splits of 60:30:10 and 20 iterations of Monte Carlo cross-validation were used. Network performance was assessed using 95% confidence intervals of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The axial and AP input combination provided the most accurate results for dichotomized classification: accuracy, 0.85 +/- 0.01; sensitivity, 0.88 +/- 0.02; specificity, 0.82 +/- 0.03; PPV, 0.86 +/- 0.02; and NPV, 0.83 +/- 0.03. Similarly, the axial and AP input combination provided the best results for multiclass classification: accuracy, 0.80 +/- 0.01; sensitivity, 0.64 +/- 0.01; specificity, 0.85 +/- 0.01; PPV, 0.65 +/- 0.02; and NPV, 0.85 +/- 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports one of the first artificial intelligence-based algorithms capable of accurately and efficiently assessing collateral flow of patients with AIS. This automated method for determining collateral filling could streamline clinical workflow, reduce bias, and aid in clinical decision making for determining reperfusion-eligible patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available